With over one in 100 of the whole UK workforce commuting into an area scarcely bigger than a square mile, managing the City of London’s transport infrastructure is a highly complex process.
All highway maintenance must be planned and carried out with the greatest precision. This is made possible by reliable and detailed OS data, free through the Public Sector Mapping Agreement (PSMA).
What were the challenges?
- Dense concentration of people in the City during office hours – commuters swell its population to 400,000.
- Every year in the City there are 400 road closures, more than 3,000 utility excavations and, at any one time, over 70 building sites are in operation.
- Planning maintenance to minimise disruption and prevent gridlock on congested streets.
What was the solution?
The new works planning tool has minimised disruption and streamlined the process for managing planned work in the City. Mapping data from the PSMA underpins the tool’s visual approach which makes it easy to use and useful for communicating complex issues with senior staff.Ian Hughes, Assistant Highways Director, City of London
Every highways works job in the City is planned using a Microsoft Project file. Automated overnight processing combines it with a works extent polygon layer and a layer showing the impact area for the works. The resulting data lets the highways team spot conflicts arising from works in the same area, and works happening at the same time. Showing planned maintenance over time on a map using a slider control strongly highlights potential conflicts.
By using OS MasterMap Topography Layer and Integrated Transport Network Layer, available under the Public Sector Mapping Agreement, the extents of works and impact areas can be calculated to a sub-metre level of accuracy. This is essential for conflict prevention because even the smallest error in measurement could cause huge disruption for the City’s businesses and residents.
Before this system was introduced, organisation officers had no easy geographical representation of the extent of works or their impact, so it was difficult to compare short and long-term activities like resurfacing and major schemes. Local knowledge and experience, rather than hard data, guided decisions about which overlapping activities could go ahead.
What were the outcomes?
- New maintenance works can now be scheduled quickly and simply using the easy-to-use tool.
- By viewing all planned works on detailed OS mapping, conflicts between works can be avoided and any impacts can be predicted geographically.
- Money has been saved by cancelling resurfacing schemes on roads where major utility works are planned for a later date.
- Organisation staff now have a much better understanding of the geographical footprint of those works, the level and extent of disruption they cause, and how those activities interact with each other.
- The various teams involved in managing street works are now co-operating more effectively.
- New recruits get up to speed quicker with the complexities of managing the City's road network.
- Senior staff and politicians can be briefed on the issues easily and concisely.
- Disruption to commuter travel and the City’s important economic output is successfully being minimised.