I confirm that Ordnance Survey does hold the information you have requested.
The table below sets out our response to each of your questions for each contract, where the information is exempt from disclosure this is stated in the table and explained in further detail below the table:-
| STANDARD FIREWALL (NETWORK) | ANTI-VIRUS SOFTWARE APPLICATION | MICROSOFT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT |
1. SUPPLIER | Computacenter UK Ltd | Phoenix Software | Microsoft |
2. ANNUAL SPEND | £181K | £12,480 | £943.000 |
3. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES | Support contract | Support contract | Licensing of Microsoft products |
4. PRIMARY BRAND | | | |
5. EXPIRY DATE | 31/12/2021 | 28/09/2022 | 30/11/2021 |
6. START DATE | 1/1/2018 | 22/12/2017 | 1/12/2018 |
7. CONTRACT DURATION | 3 years | 3 years | 3 years |
8. RESPONSIBLE CONTRACT OFFICER |
Supplier Relationship Manager
Full name/direct email/telephone numbers are exempt under s.40(2) of the FOIA (see below)
|
Supplier Relationship Manager
Full name/direct email/telephone numbers are exempt under s.40(2) of the FOIA (see below)
|
Supplier Relationship Manager
Full name/direct email/telephone numbers are exempt under s.40(2) of the FOIA (see below)
|
9. NUMBER OF LICENCES | N/A | N/A | Exempt under s.43(2) of the FOIA (see below) |
Exempt Information:
Question 8: Section 40(2) Personal Information
The information relating to the full name and direct email and personal contact numbers are held by Ordnance Survey but exempt from disclosure under section 40(2) (personal information) of the FOI Act, as the information constitutes personal data.
Section 40(2) provides that personal data is exempt information if one of the conditions set out in section 40(3) is satisfied. In our view, disclosure of this information would breach the data protection principles contained in the General Data Protection Regulations and Data Protection Act 2018
In reaching this decision, we have particularly considered:
- the reasonable expectations of the employees: given their positions, Ordnance Survey considered that none of the individuals would have a reasonable expectation that their personal data would be disclosed;
- the consequences of disclosure; and
- any legitimate public interest in disclosure.
Section 40(2) is an absolute exemption and therefore not subject to the public interest test.
However, under the duty to provide information and assistance in accordance with section 16 of FOIA, we can provide the following information which may assist you in this matter.
You can find out information in relation to our procurement process on our website in our ‘Guide to Suppliers’ and also contact us via the contact us form or on Tel: 03456 05 05 05.
Question 9: Section 43(2) (prejudice to the commercial interests of any person)
I confirm we do hold the number of licences for the Microsoft Enterprise Agreement contract however, we are unable to provide this information as we consider it to be exempt from disclosure under section 43(2) (prejudice to the commercial interest of any person).
We consider that the release of the number of licences in combination with the contract value provides information about the pricing of the licences under this contract. This information would be likely to cause commercial prejudice, as it provides an insight into the suppliers commercial pricing which could be used to the disadvantage of our supplier in its negotiations and could be used by the competitors of our supplier. In addition, the disclosure of this information would be likely to have an adverse impact on Ordnance Survey’s ability to negotiate the best price for future services.
Section 43(2) is a qualified exemption, and we are required to consider the public interest. Ordnance Survey recognises the need for transparency; however, this must be balanced against the public interest in allowing the organisation and third parties to protect their commercial information. In this case, we are satisfied that there is greater public interest in withholding the information under this exemption.